Netlib Database Encryption Software --- Encryptionizer
 
Friday, May 02, 2008

NetLib in SQL Server Magazine: Protecting the Database with Encryption

 
Monday, March 03, 2008

NetLib Releases Encryptionizer x64 - Database Encryption for the x64 OS

 
Wednesday, February 06, 2008

Don't Let the Bullies Get Your Lunch Money

 
News Archives...
 
Home >> Encryption for SQL Server and MSDE: FAQ >> Encryptionizer vs. EFS
Encryptionizer vs. EFS

Microsoft’s Encrypted File System (EFS) will be an acceptable solution for many people. However we believe that NetLib® Encryptionizer® offers some important advantages over the Encrypted File System.  We try to outline a few here.

Feature / Comparison NetLib
Encryptionizer
EFS  Comments
Operating Systems WinNT, Win2K, WinXP, Win95, Win98, WinME, Win3.X*, MSDOS*

 

* with legacy versions

Win2K, WinXP Encrypted files can be protected across different platforms and media types –  e.g., SQL Server on Win2K and MSDE on WinME can both use same encryption strategy.
File Systems
NTFS, FAT32, FAT16, CDROM, DVD, RDR, RAW NTFS  
Encrypted files can be protected from Domain/Windows Administrator.
Yes No Additional layer of protection disassociated with rights.
Files copied to non-NTFS media can be automatically encrypted Yes No Backups can be automatically encrypted even if on non-NTFS media.
Performance
Asynchronous I/O Synchronous I/O May possibly result in decreased performance, according to Microsoft
Support for Windows NT 4.0
Yes No  
Supports encrypted files on CDROM and DVD
Yes No  
Can integrate into an install script Yes No Easy to bundle with an application. EFS must be deployed by end user.
Keys can be stored on another server, diskette, CD, USB key, etc., for additional security. Yes No  
Can be used to encrypt individual columns Yes (*) No (*)Requires column encryption option. 
       
 

NetLib is a subsidary of Communication Horizons © 2008 Communication Horizons LLC.
"NetLib" and "Encryptionizer" are Registered Trademarks of Communication Horizons
US Pat. 7,069,591. International patents pending.